Sorcery: Contested Realm Legalese — How Magician Almost Skirted the Fine Print

Written by ForceofPhil

Throughout the goings-on at SorceryCon 2026 in Indianapolis, IN, I was fortunate to speak to dozens of players smarter than me who have a deeper grasp of the rules within the Realm. As a stalwart of self-expression in deckbuilding, damned be my future ELO rating*, I blabbed any chance I could about my deep dive into proving that Magician isn't just a meme.

The chip on my shoulder is undoubtedly detrimental to my tournament results, but the trade-off is unknowingly painting the bull's eye for on-target ideas shared by others. The interaction most likely to be a judge staff's debate fantasy over post-tourney dinner was how Magician, by virtue of having sites in its Spellbook, might be able to skirt the fine print of Demonic Contract.

* A method for calculating the relative skill levels of players, created by Arpad Elo, a Hungarian-American chess master and physics professor.

Legally Buy Cards To Support Eternal Durdles

Demonic Contract

Search your spellbook for any card, reveal it, put it into your hand, then shuffle afterward.

You may only search for a spell that has rarity lower or equal to a Demon minion that you control. As an additional cost to cast Demonic Contract you must pay 4 life, or reach another accord with said demon by sacrificing a coin, egg, frog, gem, goat, rune, treasure, or Mortal soul.

In the context of any Avatar that isn't Magician, there is no ambiguity. A player can search their spellbook for a card. Powerful, but not controversial.

The second line, belovedly appreciated as flavorful fine print, states the caveat for what the quality search target can be — a rarity lower than or equal to that of a demon you control. Then, there is the additional cost of four life or the sacrifice of a trinket, small animal, breakfast food, or the literal soul of someone embattled with the human condition.

When Magician sits down with the demon to negotiate the terms of the agreement, however, it gets a bit trickier.

The top line and the first line of fine print are seemingly contradictory for Magician. For other Avatars, every card in their Spellbook is a spell. Magician isn't so exclusive, since sites are also in its Spellbook.

So what, then, are we to make of the first line of fine print:

You may only search for a spell that has rarity lower or equal to a Demon minion that you control.

Per the Codex, the word "may" has implicit rules associated with it:

May and Can

If an effect uses the word "may" or "can," it is optional, e.g. Aramos Mercenaries or Felbog Frog Men.

Exception: if the effect uses "may only" or "can only," then it's actually a mandatory restriction, e.g. Dalcean Phalanx or Morgana le Fay.

If Magician "may" search for a spell and "may" is optional, then couldn't it be argued in the high court of the Realm that Magician can search for a site, thereby reasonably opting out of the clause defined in the fine print, since the first line states "search for a card?"

Of course, we have to investigate the "exception," which states that "may only" is a mandatory action and, therefore, reads functionally as "must." It begs the question: why does the legalese of the Realm allow an oxymoron in a binding contract? Failing to find is inherently allowed within the broader rules text and, therefore, doesn't need flexible phrasing to avoid a player's compulsion to search for something that might not exist.

Regardless, by searching for a site within the Spellbook, Magician is not breaching the contract, right? The contract explicitly states "search your Spellbook for any card," which Magician is adhering to. The fine print stating that it may only search for a spell is also not breached, since, per Magician's ruling in the Codex:

Magician, FAQ #1

All cards in your Spellbook are considered spells while in your Spellbook, so you can draw it normally.

Once the searched-for card is no longer in Magician's Spellbook, however, it is no longer considered a spell, per the Magician's Codex FAQ #3, which states:

What if an effect specifies a spell or site from a zone other than my spellbook?

If an effect cares about spell vs. site while the card is outside of your Spellbook, you must follow the effect correctly at the moment the effect resolves.

The fine print of Demonic Contract most certainly cares about the searched-for card being a spell, which sites are whilst in Magician's Spellbook. Magician's rulings clearly state that the Magician must be honest about what cards in its hand are sites or spells when such an effect cares specifically about a site versus a spell.

After signing the Demonic Contract, if the searched-for card were honestly revealed to be a site, would Magician no longer need to abide by the first line of fine print of said contract, since the searched-for card is a site and not a spell?

Since the searched-for card is not a spell, and the additional cost of four life or other accord would have already been reached to cast the spell in the first place, wouldn't the requirement of controlling a demon minion be void?

Accounting for all this, wouldn't it be legal for Magician to cast Demonic Contract, search for a site, and then effectively opt out of the contract's demon clause in the fine print since no clause is breached at any point?

Help Fund Eternal Durdles' Legal Bills On Patreon

The Verdict

After deliberation by two of the most esteemed Judges in the Realm at SorceryCon 2026, the determination was that Magician must still abide by the Demonic Contract's fine print as though it were any other Avatar due to sites being considered spells whilst in the Spellbook and, therefore, must supply the demonic requirement.

Move to Appeal

As a peasant of the Realm, I am bound to respectfully adhere to the ruling of the Judges of the Realm, as should we all. The Judges of the Realm are the most thoughtful amongst us, and I respect their verdicts within the guidelines they have available to them.

I would, however, like to appeal their ruling to Erik's Curiosa so that we may have an official ruling added to Magician's FAQ that directly addresses this interaction with Demonic Contract.

Refine Print

Until then, when knowingly uncertain of how cards interact in the Realm, resist your inner demon and ask a Judge before committing to the act in a match.